Ban lifted on ‘gender-abortion’ doctor

27 February 2016

One of the doctors involved in Aisling Hubert’s legal challenge against ‘gender-abortion’ has had his ban lifted.

Dr Palaniappan Rajmohan was recorded by undercover journalists from The Telegraph in 2012, offering to arrange an abortion for a woman simply because the child was a girl.

The doctor himself admitted that this amounted to ‘gender-abortion’, saying to the woman:

“That’s not fair. It’s like female infanticide, isn’t it?”

He then agreed to offer the abortion, documenting in records that it was because the girl was “too young for pregnancy”.

Dr Rajmohan, who worked at the Calthorpe Clinic in Edgbaston, Birmingham, was suspended for three months last October, by the General Medical Council (GMC).

But last month at a review hearing, the panel ruled that the doctor’s fitness to practise was no longer impaired, after he said he thought he was acting in the ‘best interests’ of the patient.

In a statement that was read out during Dr Rajmohan’s hearing in January, he also said:

“I’m ashamed and sorry that I have brought disgrace to the profession, public trust and also let down my colleagues, at the same time bringing disrepute to my employing trust.” 

Aisling Hubert’s ongoing legal challenge

Christian Legal Centre client and pro-life campaigner Aisling Hubert is involved in an ongoing legal challenge, to bring Dr Rajmohan, and another doctor caught offering a ‘gender-abortion’, to justice.

In 2013, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) took up a case against Dr Rajmohan and Dr Prabha Sivaraman.

But, despite video footage providing evidence that the doctors were guilty, the CPS then dropped the case, saying that it was “not in the public interest” to prosecute.

Supported by the Christian Legal Centre, 22-year-old Aisling took up a case against the CPS, challenging this failure to prosecute.

‘Huge injustice’

In December, her application for Judicial Review was refused – a decision she immediately decided to appeal.

At the time, she commented: “There is a huge injustice here. There was clear video evidence that doctors were willing to offer abortion on the grounds of the child being the ‘wrong’ gender. That is against the law, and yet the CPS refused to prosecute, refused to release important video evidence and then squashed my attempt to fight for justice.

“CCTV footage is routinely used by police and the CPS to convict criminals in our courts and yet, in this case, the DPP has refused to allow the courts to consider the evidence.

“The failure of the DPP to take action gives the impression that we have abortion on demand, for whatever reason.

“This decision must be challenged, and I plan to appeal this week’s ruling.

“Every human life is precious and we must continue to fight for justice.”

Aisling’s court challenge has left her with substantial legal costs over £40,000.

‘Persistently undermined’

Chief Executive of the Christian Legal Centre Andrea Williams has said that such a penalty for pursuing justice stands in sharp contrast to the GMC’s decision to lift Dr Rajmohan’s ban.

“It is astounding that Aisling, who is rightfully seeking justice for the unborn child, should be faced with these costs, while the doctor guilty of offering a ‘gender-abortion’ should be dealt such a light sentence.

“Dr Rajmohan was right to apologise for bringing disgrace to his profession. But more importantly, he agreed to an abortion based simply on the child’s gender.

“His apology fails to recognise the seriousness of this action – as did his three-month suspension.”

Commenting on Aisling’s decision to appeal, Andrea said:

“Aisling’s attempts to seek justice have been persistently undermined by the CPS. At all stages of this case, there have been major challenges, but Aisling has been determined to carry on and speak on behalf of the unborn child. We will continue to support her as she seeks an appeal.

“Every human being is made in the image of God, and life should be protected from the moment of conception.”

Related Links:

Ban lifted on abortion doctor who agreed to gender-based termination (Telegraph)

Find out more about Aisling Hubert
  • Share

Related articles

All content has been loaded.

Take action

Join our email list to receive the latest updates for prayer and action.

Find out more about the legal support we're giving Christians.

Help us put the hope of Jesus at the heart of society.

Privacy settings

Our website uses cookies, usage analysis and other technologies. We use these tools because they help us to run our website, provide you with content (including video and audio clips), understand how people use our website, make improvements to our services, and promote our work more effectively. This means that we and selected third-party services may store cookies and other similar information on your device, and may analyse how you use our website. Some of these tools are necessary for our website to function as intended but others are optional, and you can choose whether or not to allow them. You can find out more here.

Core functionality

Certain cookies and other technologies are used on our website to provide core functionality. You can read more about this here. You may be able to use your browser settings to block these tools but if you do, our website may not function as intended.

Embedded content

To enrich your experience of this website, we embed carefully selected content from other platforms. For example, we embed video clips from our YouTube channel, and audio clips from our SoundCloud channel. These third-party platforms may store and use cookies (or similar technology) on your device, and may analyse your use of this site or the embedded content. We do not directly control what technologies they use. You can find out more here. If embedded content is disabled it may affect your experience of this website.

Analytics and promotion

This website uses tools from selected third-party providers (Google and Facebook) to help us understand how people arrive at and use our website, and to measure and improve the effectiveness of some of our promotional activity. These tools may store and use cookies (and similar information) on your device, and analyse your use of this website, and other sites and platforms. These tools help us to improve our services, reach people who may be interested in our work and make better use of our resources but information may be shared with these third-party providers and may be used for their own purposes. You can find out more here.