74-year-old Christian governor suspended for questioning introduction of LGBT Pride and books in school
13 October 2019 Issued by: Christian Legal CentreA Christian school governor with 40 years’ experience working as a nurse has been suspended for questioning at a governors meeting why parents had not been properly consulted on the introduction of a Pride month and LGBT books into the school library.
Since the early 1990s, Mrs Griffith, 74, had been a governor at Alperton Community School in Brent, North London, where she had helped shape the school’s curriculum, pioneered the school’s health and safety policies and introduced better disabled access. Passionate about making a difference to her community and with a deep love of children, Mrs Griffith had also for decades given advice and guidance to children at the school from difficult backgrounds.
Passionate about making a difference
Growing up in Barbados under British rule as the eldest of 11 siblings, Mrs Griffith’s ambition had been to come to the UK to train to be a nurse. In 1964 at the age of 16 she arrived in London and after completing her training worked as a general nurse at Neasden Hospital, had a family, and, after being recommended by her church, began her role as a governor.
This was until 1 May 2019, however, when Mrs Griffith attended a Curriculum and Standards meeting at the school. A stickler for detail and for things being done properly, Mrs Griffith always requested any relevant documentation in hard copy prior to meetings so that everything could be properly scrutinised.
One booklet she received ahead of the meeting was from the school’s library, where new members of staff planned to introduce genre-specific reading lists for LGBTQ+ Pride Month for the next school year.
Parents not properly consulted
“At the meeting,” Mrs Griffith said, “I raised that the introduction of LGBT books and Pride month into the school had not been mentioned before at any previous meetings. I said that parents had not been consulted and that there would be parents with children from religious backgrounds who would object and not want their children to have this form of sex education. I urged them to consider those families, and added that as a parent myself, I would not have wanted my sons to be reading LGBT books or to be involved in an LGBT Pride month.
“As I said this, a member of staff stood up and left the room and the clerk of the school began to rage at me saying: ‘Look what you’ve gone and done, you’ve upset him.’ She then told me that I should be accepting of what was happening as it is law.
“I know there were members of staff present who were glad that I raised the issue as they felt unable to do so themselves. After this, my understanding is that two people present complained about what I had said.”
Suspension a “last resort”
On 21 May 2019, Mrs Griffith received a letter from school’s clerk, Jo Sattaur, telling her that she had ‘breached the Governors Code of Conduct and made homophobic comments at a public meeting, that were offensive to members of staff.’
The letter said that she had been suspended, that an investigation would commence, and that ‘the governing board will only use suspension/removal as a last resort after seeking to resolve any difficulties or disputes in more constructive ways.’ The letter added that: ‘In all maintained schools, and where an academy trust board decides, the chair is permitted to act in cases of urgency where a delay in exercising the function would be likely to be seriously detrimental to the interests of the school, a pupil, a parent or member of staff.’
After receiving support from the Christian Legal Centre, Mrs Griffith wrote to the school in response to the suspension asking for full details of the allegations against her and asked what she had said that had caused such offence. She also wrote:
‘I respectfully invite you to reconsider my suspension. As you say, the code of conduct states that the suspension is a “last resort”, which will only be used when strictly necessary. Surely, suspension is only necessary and appropriate in cases of serious misconduct, not for a comment someone objects to.’
On 3 July, Mrs Griffith, accompanied by Pastor Ade Omooba MBE, attended a meeting at the school and was told that there would be a ‘speedy conclusion’ to the process. Since then Mrs Griffith has heard nothing.
No scrutiny allowed
“My mother always taught me that things have to be done properly,” Mrs Griffith said. “Therefore, whether as a nurse where I am responsible for patient safety or as a governor where I am responsible for a child’s education and shaping the school environment, it is my job to notice things that others do not. In meetings where someone may want to push something through, I scrutinise, and this leads to discussion, debate and finding consensus on the right way to move forward.
“When they told me I had been ‘homophobic’ for scrutinising the introduction of LGBT Pride month, I had to go home and look up what it meant. I couldn’t believe it. It never occurred to me that I could be ‘homophobic’ or scared of something. These things don’t come into my head.
“But now with this LGBT agenda, not just in schools, but across society, there is no debate, no questioning and there is only a one-way democracy.
“I loved being part of education and planning what was happening at the school. I am, however, at peace over the whole situation. I am not annoyed; I am only saddened that this is happening in this country.
“My faith in Jesus is very important to me in good and bad times – it is my be all and end all. I can do nothing without His help, and he makes my burden lighter. This is how my mum brought me up.”
No one is exempt from punishment
Andrea Williams, Chief Executive of the Christian Legal Centre, said: “What has taken place at this school is a microcosm of what is happening across our society and sends a clear message to teachers, governors and students: if you oppose the LGBT agenda you will be silenced and punished.
“No one is exempt, not even a kind, caring and compassionate woman in her 70s who has dedicated her whole life to caring for others and increasing the life chances of children and improving her community.
“Such censor for merely questioning whether books with LGBT themes are appropriate for school libraries, and asking whether parents had been properly consulted, cannot go unchallenged. We call on the school to reinstate Mrs Griffith and issue a full apology.”
